Solved WD EXTERNAL HARD DISK 1TB suddenly "unallocated" and "not initialized"

[jumanji]

Ok, that is nothing different from what you posted earlier. It is a relief that your experiments so far haven't done any damage.

We may have to do some experiments and see whether these work.

1. Live Linux pen drive. Well, you already prepared Linux Mint, but I am not familiar with it. So I would ask you to prepare a Lucid Puppy pen drive instead. Download Lucid Puppy (Ubuntu-Compatible Build) 5.2.8 from Download latest Puppy Linux release and prepare your bootable pendrive with that ISO using Rufus Rufus - Create bootable USB drives the easy way. ( Back up any data on the pendrive before you run Rufus)

With your external drive only connected, boot from the pendrive and check whether your external drive is accessible.

Read the following guide on using Lucid Puppy. ( Please note that in that Guide we are recovering data from a non-bootable system drive. In your case you will identify the external drive by its capacity and try to see whether you can access the data in it by mounting only your external drive. Take care not to mount your System drive or do anything with it.)

Just mount the external drive and see whether you can see the data in it. If you can see then you can connect another external drive and copy. ( Please do not copy to your internal drive. It can create problems.)

http://www.sevenforums.com/software/198909-lucid-puppy-way-recover-files-non-bootable-computer.html

If you have any problem stop to ask for guidance. I shall be peeping in now and then.

 

[Jon Snow]

Hi Mr. Jumanji.

So I've tried both Linux Mint and Lucid Puppy. Both methods failed to read this troublesome HD. I did exactly like it supposed to be done, connect the external before booting the OS. I do not know how to take screenshot during that process, but I noticed that on startup, (whilst in Lucid Puppy) it says "Partion_table(): Disk read failed", the very first line - before it loads some drivers.
Any other ways we can try? This is getting scary

 

[Slartybart]

@Jon Snow: Time zone differences (12 hrs) makes it more difficult for me to assist you. jumanji is helping you and I'll defer to him on this thread.

The important thing to remember about data recovery is that it can be a slow process. Take your time and be patient while members work out the next step, then follow their advice and provide screenshots or log files when asked.

In the mean time, it would be helpful if you filled in the system specs for your machine
- see the Easy System Specs link in my signature.

Thanks
.

 

[jumanji]

OK, let us give up on Linux. I think in this case both Mint and Lucid Puppy failed to read your problem external drive.

Since its time for you to retire and also my time to, is fast approaching, I shall wind up the day with this last post.

The best option at this point is get on to PhotoRec. You have already used Test Disk and Testdisk did find your drive. If you have another external drive to copy all data have it connected too. After making sure that both external drives are seen (in Windows Disk Management), run PhotoRec.

One feature of PhotoRec is that it does not write anything to any drive and there is no way you can go wrong and muck up things.

The most important feature is it does not look for a file system to recover the data and PW does not show any file system in that problem drive. So I am hoping that it can reconstruct the files. Scanning with PhotoRec will take a long long time. So we will not run it a second time, reason why I want you to connect another empty external drive before you start so that in case it does its job successfully, you can straight away copy those files. ( If you abort, no harm will be done but you have to start it all over again.)

Give this thread a good reading before you start. http://www.sevenforums.com/software/193467-guide-using-photorec-recovery-software.html Straight away go to the topic under Recovery. In the third window select whole disk. ( I think only that will be shown if at all. Let us hope for the best.)

Note: If you read the whole thread, you may become aware that it can recover files even after formatting the drive ( which is what I did formatting one partition and then recovery.) We shall however keep it as the final option. Not now.

 

[Jon Snow]

Alright thanks to both of you, for spending some times dealing with my paranoia. Cant help it, the disk is my backup and i have a lot of valuable, sentimental items inside it. I shall do exactly what you guide me, Mr. Jumanji and I'll come back within days (as I know, 1TB will take a lot of time, perhaps more than 24hrs to scan, and actually my disk has over 600GB worth of space items inside it, mostly HD videos).

I'll look up for some good external hard disk to purchase, the one that has good reputation amongst user. While dealing with this problem, I read/googled almost every keywords i can think of, and I noticed that lots of people having problem with Western Digital and Seagate, so I'm not gonna take another risk on buying them again lol. Or maybe I'm just too paranoid, but yeah. Any recommendation about which one should I look for?

I'll let you know if there's progress. (FINGERS CROSSED)

 

[jumanji]

Yep, do it slowly. Do not worry too much. If data is still there I am sure we can get it.( I see no reason why data would have been lost at the moment.)

As a matter of fact we can try to initialise the problem drive and see whether it goes through. But I don't want it to be tried now - unless we make a copy of sector one before doing that. ( If we stop with only initialisation it affects only the first sector without touching other sectors where all data resides.)

And if PhotoRec fails for some reason, I would try cloning the problem drive first and attempt data recovery on the cloned drive. For that too you will require an empty drive of slightly larger capacity.

We can try all these options after PhotoRec.

 

[nooruddin76]

Your had disk seems to be dead..so you'll have to just concentrate on recovering data. And you maybe able to

 

[jumanji]

^ Just curious. What makes you think that the disk is dead? Any technical reasons? What portion of the drive do you think could have gone dead?

 

[nooruddin76]

Jon. You'll be able to just save data if your lucky, so focus on that

 

[Jon Snow]

Noorudin, thank you for your help earlier. In a matter of fact, I believe my hard drive is not dead. I think on the first sector where it holds some information about partition table, MBR and everything necessary, is in a "bad" state. I actually understand about these things, but as always I'm a bit paranoid of doing something I'm not sure of, therefore I seek for some advice. I read somewhere there's a technique to relocate the first bad sector into another, and it'll resurrect the drive, but it just that I dont have enough experience of doing this. Therefore I'm gonna opt for safe option for me, though I hope along the way - blackout would not gonna happen otherwise the scanning process will be a waste lol.

Slartybart, I have a 6 years old laptop that I use since December 2008, it's slow - it has Intel Celeron. I think this is why the scanning process takes like forever.

 

[nooruddin76]

if there were any partition table information on ur drive partition wizard would have cached it so if it didn't find any partition table means windows can't be stored. Hence the word 'dead' in that context, but data can be there.

 

[jumanji]

@Jon Snow,

OK, you seem to have done quite a bit of search and research on Read only drives.

It is quite possible that you might have hit on this article. If not read it. It should enable you to decide which drive you may want to buy. https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6121 .( Though mostly apple imac users face this read only problem, it applies in your case.)

In the worst case scenario, you may want to buy the exact same model as your present problem drive to be able to replace the Sata interface-built into-HDD controller card, if your drive falls into that category. It has been at the back of my mind that the Sata Interface could have failed but I did not want to rush to say that till you decided not to go in for WD drives.

As far as the capacity requirement is concerned since you have only 800GB of data the same 1TB drive should be sufficient (the same capacity as your problem drive) even if we want to clone it.

 

[jumanji]

if there were any partition table information on ur drive partition wizard would have cached it so if it didn't find any partition table means windows can't be stored. Hence the word 'dead' in that context, but data can be there.

Corrupt should perhaps be the right word and not dead. If VBR is corrupt, Partition Wizard cannot find the beginning of that partition and hence cannot rewrite the partition table into the first sector.

 

[Slartybart]

Partition Wizard (PW) and Disk Management (DM) report things slightly different. This is the way each was designed.

PW reports the drive as read only and unallocated
DM reports the drive as uninitialized and unallocated.

These are quite different things, but probably stem from the same problem.

You could check with diskpart - Be very careful with diskpart.

If jumanji agrees that it would be useful, give him the chance to read my post BEFORE you do anything. As I said before, I'm deferring to him on this thread. I'm only offering things that I think might be helpful in diagnosing the issue.

I do not want to detract from the Photorec path already suggested.

Open an http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/783-elevated-command-prompt.html

   Tip

Standard keyboard shortcuts for Copy (Ctrl-C) and Paste (Ctrl-V) shortcuts do not work in Command Prompt.

Enabling the Quick Edit Mode in Command Prompt makes Copy and Paste operations easier.
See step 4 in http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/21874-command-prompt-copy-clipboard.html to enable it.

Copy in Command Prompt: hightlight the text you want to copy, then press ENTER.
Paste in Command Prompt: right click with your mouse.

Type the following commands:
diskpart
lis dis
sel dis 1
det dis
exit

Post a screen shot of the Command Prompt window and then exit Command Prompt
See: http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/9733-screenshots-files-upload-post-seven-forums.html

One step at a time, jumanji put the focus on Photrec and has a number of options if that fails to recover your data.

Bill
.

 

[Jon Snow]

Here it is Slartybart

 

[Jon Snow]

Side Note. I tried on Windows 7, it didnt work (the "det dis") , the CMD suddenly stopped working. This, i tried on Windows 8.

 

[Slartybart]

Thanks Jon,

The diskpart details show that the readonly flag is indeed set.

The Location Path: UNAVAILABLE is normal and no cause for concern.

I'll wait for jumanji to determine if he wants to pursue the read only flag or get back to Photorec.

There are many possible paths and jumanji is one of the best members to help with data recovery issues. It's difficult and time consuming, so that's why I don't want you to do anything other than one path at a time. The diskpart was a reporting exercise, so no harm...no foul.

edit: That's odd - det dis it doesn't work on Win7, but it's ok on Win8
On your Win7 machine, please follow this tutorial: http://www.sevenforums.com/windows-...ne-activation-issue-posting-instructions.html

I'm on the sidelines again.

 

[Jon Snow]

yeah i read the photorec reviews, it's indeed managed to recover files, but the files will be all over the place without proper names and the scanning will take more than 2 days. I think if there's other way, we can try perhaps and Photorec will be our last option. will that be possible? Yeah I know, Mr. Jumanji is really helpful. Glad that he saw this thread

 

[Slartybart]

Any recovery will take a long time and the results are never guaranteed.

I'm fairly certain that jumanji wants to use Photrec as the FIRST option.
I'll let him speak for himself, though.

Give jumanji the chance to help you the way he knows best.

 

[Jon Snow]

Alright Im counting on you guys