The main improvement in the V6 pro for me is fast delta restores. If you are restoring a recent image over an existing install it will only restore the differences resulting in vastly improved restore times.[...]
That's a plus for sure.
Lost the other multi-quote along the way, but I believe it was DavidE who answered my other question, pointing out that recovery media made with v5 cannot restore images made with V6.... And that's exactly what I wanted to know.
From other comments it sounded like recovery media made with v6 can restore images made with v5.... which would make sense.
And imho they should have made the imaging of v6 backwards compatible with recovery media created in earlier versions.... at least with v5.
Someone along the way also asked where I got the info of a recovery console, but I believe that was cleared up along the way. On the MR main page for v6 one of the benefits and new features mentioned is "no recovery media required" as you can restore images from a console (I assumed DOS-based that would come up as an option if the drive wasn't booting). But that's a guess. Now I understand one can alternately use media as well/instead of...
A final question...
Are there any compensatory cloud features, ads, or other W10-type functioning in v6? If it is not a non-cloud, stand-alone program, I am personally not interested in changing over.
Anecdotally, was great to see so many FFS users... been a user for many years... keep all data off the C drive, and use FFS nightly to backup the days work to a mem stick, in between monthly MR BUs of all partitions. Also use it for my Music and Archive drive to sync to external BU drives, as it's quicker than MR for mirroring those.
And btw someone referred to me as a 'he' which is reasonable considering my name, but I am a 'she' - not that it matters, but FTR.